🔗 Share this article

A decade following the UK embarked on a hurried referendum that split the nation and unleashed turmoil, a warning comes from beyond the Irish Sea: it may occur once more.

Policymakers and citizens entered unwittingly Brexit and the identical might transpire with a national vote on a united Ireland, initiating convulsions for which nobody is equipped.

That conveys the caution from two prominent journalists from either side of the Irish border who have joined forces to analyse the pros and cons of Northern Ireland departing the UK to form a different country with the Republic of Ireland.

Administrative Establishments Ill-Equipped

The author and columnist and Sam McBride, have found that the political establishments in Ireland and Britain are extremely unprepared for a possibly contentious and seismic public vote.

"The key takeaway of Brexit has gone unabsorbed, which is that developments can come out of the blue and can gather momentum swiftly," the commentator stated. "In my opinion that the institutional structure of our archipelago remains highly fragile."

Book Publication Intends to Stir Debate

The duo have analysed the political, economic and societal rationales for any governmental shift in a volume, For and Against a United Ireland, issued by the Irish Royal Irish Academy.

They seek to provoke discussion on the topic with a tour of speaking events that will bring them to Westminster soon.

"What concerns all parties, or should haunt every person, is the Brexit referendum of 2016," said O’Toole.

"We should prevent a national vote on a thumbs up-thumbs down, unclear proposal whose results have not been clarified because then you end up with an highly split population where those defeated are unable to accept losing and the victorious side don't know precisely what it is that they have achieved."

Constitutional Provision

Under the Good Friday agreement, the Northern Ireland secretary of state is obliged to schedule a public vote on Irish unification if it is indicated that a most voters would approve.

Nationalist parties and other pro-unification groups claim that moment is looming, and a non-profit called Ireland’s Future has built momentum, but both governments and unionists play down the prospect, making it uncertain if and when there will be a national vote.

Insufficient Serious Debate

Partisan language supporting and opposing unification has obscured the absence of informed dialogue, noted McBride.

"Individuals are often supportive or opposed the concept but the concrete planning which could extend past that to make it possible has largely not occurred. A great deal has gone on in scholarly circles but very few government figures or activists seek to involve themselves with the essentials. For instance, what sort of state might be preferred? Centralised? Federal?"

Volume's Strategy

In the volume, none of the commentators advocates unity or the existing arrangement. Each writes two essays that strive for neutrality in laying out the argument for a unified Ireland and the rationale against, gathering financial and societal statistics, historical precedents and governmental frameworks.

Discussions cover flags and symbols, taxes, medical care, elderly benefits, sovereign debt obligations and the danger of unionist unrest. The aim is to educate and provoke conversation.

"There's huge interest in the subject but there has not yet occurred a debate," stated O’Toole. "Discussion indicates an recognition of the notion that there might be valid points on each side."

Simultaneous Plebiscites

A public vote in Northern Ireland would additionally cause one in the Republic of Ireland, where the electorate claim they prefer unity but oppose greater financial contributions or adopting a alternative symbol to recognise pro-UK communities' British identity.

"The Irish government must determine what the proposal from pro-unification movements is beyond just stating: 'We desire a united Ireland and we love you'," remarked O’Toole.

Possibility of Referendum

McBride believes a national vote in his era is probable and that it could happen suddenly. "There might be just a reckless or a ill-advised or a negligent government minister who says: 'We should proceed and settle the matter.'"

Both pro-unification advocates and unionists have plausible, valid perspectives, he commented. "One side will prevail on this issue and the other side will eventually lose but both parties has has valuable insights to acquire from the opposing positions."

Appeal for Broader Discussion

Westminster must engage with the debate, stated O’Toole. "This is about your state. It is a UK matter equally as it is an Irish matter."